Butterfly pattern — harmonic X-A-B-C-D reversal beyond point X

Last verified: · Long-term evergreen content
Risk warning · YMYL This article is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Trading on the Forex market involves a high risk of capital loss — ESMA reports 74–89% of retail accounts lose money.

The Butterfly is a harmonic reversal formation whose name and general shape were popularised by the Australian analyst Bryce Gilmore, while its strict Fibonacci ratios were assigned to it by Scott Carney. Its signature is a point D that falls beyond point X — the place where price overshoots its original move and exhausts itself. That is exactly what sets the Butterfly apart from the calmer Gartley. Below I explain how to recognise it and trade it.

What the Butterfly pattern is and where it came from

The Butterfly is a five-point formation labelled X-A-B-C-D. The idea came from Bryce Gilmore, who studied geometric relationships on charts in the 1990s, but the strict modern definition with concrete numbers is owed to Scott Carney and his family of harmonic patterns. The Butterfly is treated as a trend-exhaustion formation: it appears at the end of a stretched move, when the market makes one last push and turns back.

It is best understood as part of a wider logic. If you are starting out, work through the basics of trading harmonic patterns first — they all rest on the same relationships between legs and differ only in their retracement and extension levels. The Butterfly is one of the two variants in which the entry falls beyond point X.

Structure and Fibonacci levels

"Harmonic patterns identify price relationships using Fibonacci ratio analysis to define precise turning points in the market." — Scott M. Carney, Harmonic Trading, Volume One, Pearson, 2010

The formation has five points joined by four legs: X-A, A-B, B-C and C-D. The X-A leg is the longest, opening move that defines the whole span of the pattern. The A-B leg is the first correction and ends point B exactly on the 0.786 retracement of the XA leg — the mandatory, defining level of the Butterfly. If point B lands anywhere else, you are usually looking at a different harmonic formation, not a Butterfly.

Next comes the B-C leg, which retraces between 0.382 and 0.886 of the AB leg — a freer range that gives the formation flexibility. The heart of the Butterfly is the final segment, the C-D leg. Point D should complete on the 1.272 to 1.618 extension of the XA leg, and the most important number here is 1.272. In the same place you usually find an extension between 1.618 and 2.618 of the B-C leg, together with an AB=CD structure, the equality of leg spans measured from the end. That convergence marks the potential reversal zone. To plot it you reach for the same Fibonacci extensions used to set targets, while plain Fibonacci retracements teach the logic of the corrections.

Hypothetical example — bullish Butterfly on EUR/USD (illustrative figures)
Point Xlow of the opening move, at 1.1000
Point Ahigh of the X-A leg at 1.1300 (a 300-pip leg)
Point Ba 0.786 retracement of the XA leg, near 1.1064
Point Ca bounce to 0.618 of the AB leg, near 1.1210
Point D — entrythe 1.272 extension of the XA leg below X, near 1.0918, where the B-C extension completes

How to recognise the formation step by step

Step 1 — find the X-A opening leg

Start with a clean impulse move: point X is its beginning and point A is its end. The clearer the X-A leg, the more reliable every later measurement — in a choppy, sideways market the Butterfly will not form, because there is no clear move to overshoot.

Step 2 — confirm the B correction on 0.786

Check that the A-B leg ends point B exactly on the 0.786 retracement of the XA leg. That level is mandatory — not 0.5 and not 0.618. If the correction is shallower, you are more likely looking at a Gartley pattern or a Bat pattern, in which point B lands higher.

Step 3 — plot point D beyond point X

You accept point D only when the 1.272 to 1.618 extension of the XA leg coincides with the B-C extension and, in an ideal setup, with the AB=CD equality. Remember that point D lies beyond point X — it is the extreme of the whole structure and your entry, not point C.

Entry, stop and targets — a hypothetical example

Take the setup from the table above. Once point D completes near 1.0918, do not enter blindly at the Fibonacci level — wait for confirmation from price, such as a reversal candle in the D zone or a divergence on an oscillator, and only then open the long. The stop goes just beyond point D, the extreme of the whole formation, leaving a few pips of room for the wick that often tests that level.

Set targets conservatively along the C-D leg: the first take profit is its 38.2 percent retracement, the second around 61.8 percent. Because the risk from point D tends to be small and the rebound large, the risk-to-reward ratio usually works out favourably. The figures above are illustrative, however — they show the logic of the formation, not a forecast of price.

The most common mistakes when trading the Butterfly

  1. Accepting point B on 0.618 instead of the mandatory 0.786 retracement of the XA leg — that is already a different formation, usually a Gartley.
  2. Confusing the Butterfly with the Crab and waiting for point D all the way out on the 1.618 extension of the XA leg, when the Butterfly usually completes at 1.272.
  3. Entering before point D completes, trading in the middle of the C-D leg on nothing more than a hunch that the market will turn.
  4. Setting the stop too tight, right at point D — the extreme is often tested by wicks, so leave a little room.
  5. Entering the Fibonacci level itself instead of waiting for a candle or a divergence that confirms a price reaction.

The Butterfly against the Gartley, Bat and Crab

The whole harmonic family rests on the same X-A-B-C-D skeleton, and the differences come down to two levels: the depth of the B correction and where point D completes. In the Gartley, point B lands on 0.618 and point D on 0.786 of the XA leg, still inside the opening move. In the Bat, the B correction is shallower (between 0.382 and 0.500), while point D goes deeper, to 0.886 — yet it still does not break past point X. The Butterfly is the first to step beyond X: point D on the 1.272 extension of the XA leg. The Crab follows the same road even further, to the 1.618 extension. The deeper point D sits, the stronger the overshoot the formation tries to catch, and the more important it becomes to wait patiently for confirmation.

Who this pattern is for, and its subjectivity

Let us be honest: the Butterfly is not a beginner's formation, and it is not an objective signal. Two traders can mark points X-A-B-C in slightly different places and arrive at two different D zones — which is why supporters of the harmonic approach themselves allow tolerances of a few percent around the "ideal" numbers. That is not a flaw you can remove but a feature of a method built on geometry. The stricter the criteria you set yourself, and the more consistently you wait for confirmation from price, the less that subjectivity will hurt you. Before you reach for the Butterfly on a live account, get a solid grip on simpler formations and on the broader technical analysis behind them. Treat it as a complementary instrument, not a standalone system.

What to do tomorrow to start learning the Butterfly pattern

  1. Open TradingView on EUR/USD in the hourly timeframe and review recent clear, stretched moves, marking points X-A-B-C in turn — this exercise teaches you to see the context of trend exhaustion before any tradable point D beyond X even appears.
  2. On each candidate, use the Fibonacci tool to check two things at once: whether point B lands exactly on the 0.786 retracement of the XA leg and whether point D completes near the 1.272 extension of the XA leg, because only those two numbers together confirm a genuine Butterfly rather than its appearance.
  3. Set up a simple journal in a spreadsheet with columns for the ratios of every leg, the entry at point D, the stop-loss just beyond it and the achieved risk-to-reward, then fill it in after each demo trade so you can see what actually works.
  4. Place a price alert at the 1.272 extension of the XA leg on a pair you are watching, instead of staring at the chart for hours — when price reaches the D zone you can calmly judge whether a reversal candle or a divergence is confirming the entry, or whether to skip the setup.
  5. Complete at least twenty demo trades using the Butterfly exclusively, documenting each one with its result — only a repeatable success rate on this niche, subjective formation justifies moving it to a live account.
Jarosław Wasiński
About the author

Jarosław Wasiński

Editor-in-chief at MyBank.pl · Financial and market analyst

Independent analyst and practitioner with 20+ years in finance. Founder and editor-in-chief of MyBank.pl, running since 2004. Fundamental analysis of FX and macro markets since 2007.

Sources & bibliography

  1. HarmonicTrader.com (Scott Carney) The Butterfly Pattern — official definition · Carney's own definition of the Butterfly: the mandatory 0.786 retracement of the XA leg at point B and the critical 1.27 XA projection at point D, complemented by an extreme 2.00–2.618 BC projection harmonictrader.com ↗
  2. HarmonicTrader.com (Scott Carney) The Gartley Pattern — official definition · Carney's definition of the Gartley, used for contrast: the 0.618 B retracement and the 0.786 XA completion at point D that stays inside the XA leg, unlike the Butterfly harmonictrader.com ↗
  3. HarmonicTrader.com (Scott Carney) Harmonic patterns overview · Index of the full Carney harmonic family (Gartley, Bat, Butterfly, Crab, Deep Crab, Shark, 5-0) giving context for where the Butterfly sits as an extended reversal beyond point X harmonictrader.com ↗

Frequently asked

How does the Butterfly pattern differ from the Gartley?
Both formations share the same five-point X-A-B-C-D structure and both were codified with Fibonacci ratios by Scott Carney, but they differ in where point D completes. In the Gartley, point D halts inside the opening leg, on the 0.786 retracement of the XA leg, so price does not break past the original point X — it is a continuation formation after a correction. In the Butterfly, point D runs far beyond point X, to the 1.272 to 1.618 extension of the XA leg, catching the moment when the market overshoots its move and exhausts itself. The second difference concerns the B correction: in the Butterfly it lands on the deeper 0.786 retracement of the XA leg, whereas in the Gartley it sits on the shallower 0.618. The simplest test: if the entry lies inside the XA leg you have a Gartley, and if it falls beyond point X you have a Butterfly.
How does the Butterfly pattern differ from the Crab?
The Butterfly and the Crab are close relatives, because both formations complete beyond point X — in both, price breaks past the start of the opening move. What separates them is the depth of point D. In the Butterfly, point D lands on the 1.272 to 1.618 extension of the XA leg, and the most important number here is 1.272. In the Crab, completion is much deeper and point D reaches the 1.618 extension of the XA leg, additionally confirmed by an extreme extension between 2.618 and 3.618 of the BC leg. The Crab is therefore a more extreme, tighter version of the same overshoot logic. They also differ in the B correction: in the Butterfly it is always 0.786 of the XA leg, while the Crab uses the shallower 0.382-to-0.618 band. In practice, remember one number: 1.272 is a Butterfly, 1.618 is a Crab.
How do you trade the Butterfly pattern — entry, stop and targets?
Entry falls in the reversal zone at point D, where the 1.272 to 1.618 extension of the XA leg coincides with an extension between 1.618 and 2.618 of the B-C leg and often with an AB=CD structure. You do not enter the Fibonacci level itself, though — wait for confirmation from price, such as a reversal candle or an oscillator divergence in the D zone. The stop loss goes just beyond point D, the extreme of the whole structure, leaving a few pips of room for the wick that tends to test that level. Targets are set conservatively along the C-D leg: the first take profit is its 38.2 percent retracement, the second around 61.8 percent. Because the risk from point D tends to be small and the rebound large, the risk-to-reward ratio usually works out favourably. Treat every figure as illustrative rather than a forecast of price.

Go deeper · the complete guide