In a hypothetical example, Anna chooses an account advertised with spreads from 0.0 pips. A separate commission means the complete round-trip cost is greater than the spread alone. Before funding, compare the tariff at the order size and holding period you intend to use.

The standard account — read the spread and tariff

A spread-only account charges its dealing cost mainly through the bid–ask difference, but the label Standard does not guarantee that every instrument has no commission or that financing and other fees disappear. Use the current account and symbol specification.

A single spread charge may be easier to reconcile, but there is no required beginner tariff or fixed waiting period before comparing Raw. A small absolute saving can still have the same proportional size. Consider the contract, order minimums, costs, platform and support together. The full list of real forex trading costs distinguishes dealing costs from financing, conversion and other charges.

ECN, Raw and Pro labels do not establish one contract

Raw or ECN labels may describe narrow spreads with a separate commission, but they do not establish a shared tariff or execution model. A commercial Pro label must be distinguished from formal professional-client classification. Read the actual agreement, eligibility and any changed protections, alongside whether commission is per side, round turn or subject to a minimum. Price structure and the legal counterparty are separate questions.

A raw-spread account can be cheaper if its combined spread and commission are lower for the intended trades. Higher activity multiplies the actual cost difference; it does not establish which tariff is cheaper without calculation. Related reading: spread and scalping, spread versus commission as the real cost.

The same 0.10-lot entry can mean 100 times the position

Start comparing Standard, Cent or Raw accounts with the contract's base-currency units. The volume field alone does not establish exposure. Two fictional accounts both show 0.10 lot EUR/USD but have different contract sizes.

Scroll sideways to see the full diagram

The same 0.10-lot entry can mean 100 times the positionAt 0.1 lot, account A's EUR 100,000 contract gives EUR 10,000 exposure and USD 1 pip value. Account B's EUR 1,000 contract gives EUR 100 exposure and USD 0.01 pip value. The difference is 100-fold.Account A: 100,000 EUR / lot0.10 lot → 10,000 EURAccount B: 1,000 EUR / lot0.10 lot → 100 EURAt 0.0001 USD per EUR per pipA: 1 USD | B: 0.01 USDExposure ratio: 100 : 1A cent balance does not explain this
We compare actual contract units, rather than the volume field's appearance or the balance display unit.

Before a first order, copy three specification fields: contract size, minimum volume and volume step. Then calculate position units and pip value. Displaying USD 100 as 10,000 cents does not itself change any of those fields.

Example assumptions: Two hypothetical accounts, without attributing these parameters to a firm or all Cent accounts. EUR/USD has a 0.0001 pip in the example; the account is in USD, with no other conversions or costs. Both accounts permit 0.10 volume. Margin and execution quality are not calculated. Mechanism source: MetaQuotes — Market Watch: Specification.

Cent, swap-free and demo — the supporting accounts

A cent display can show USD 100 as 10,000 cents; it does not itself reduce the cash value or guarantee microscopic exposure. Read contract size, minimum volume and volume step for the instrument. A cent account uses real money, while demo uses virtual funds and can differ in execution and fees. There is no mandatory Standard → Cent → Raw progression. See differences between a demo and a live account before transferring a test process to live conditions.

A swap-free account removes or changes the ordinary financing mechanism under its terms. Other administration or holding charges may apply. Compare the actual time limits and charges rather than assuming it is always a free substitute or usually more expensive.

How to total the real cost — an illustrative example

In a hypothetical EUR/USD comparison, assume EUR 100,000 per lot, USD 10 per pip per lot, a USD account, unchanged quotes and no fee minimum or rounding. A charges 1.2 pips without commission: USD 12 per lot. B charges 0.2 pip plus USD 7 per lot round turn: USD 2 + USD 7 = USD 9, or 0.9 pip. These are assumptions, not observed broker spreads, and exclude financing and other costs.

At 0.01 lot the same linear assumptions give USD 0.12 versus USD 0.09: B remains 25% cheaper on these components, although the saving is only USD 0.03. Minimums, rounding and different fills can change that relation. Compare the same actual exposure, not merely the same number in a lot field.

Order feasibility comes first. In a separate hypothetical model, USD 8 of planned price risk with a 25-pip ordinary stop and USD 10 per pip per lot gives 8 / (25 × 10) = 0.032 lot. Account A permits a 0.01 minimum and step: 0.03 lot gives USD 7.50 planned price loss, while 0.04 gives USD 10. Account B’s minimum and step are 0.10: its smallest position gives USD 25, so no positive permitted volume fits. These are invented specifications, not broker tariffs. Add costs and allow for possible slippage; an ordinary stop is not a guaranteed loss cap.

Marketing traps when choosing an account type

Advertising a minimum spread or a per-side commission does not disclose the entire transaction cost. Check fee units and timing; some platforms charge both sides upfront. Likewise, an ECN label does not establish that every order reaches one external venue or that the customer trades directly with a bank. Read the counterparty and execution policy. The ECN broker versus a market maker article discusses that separate question.

A narrow quoted spread alone does not establish execution quality. Compare reference quotes, fills, rejections and relevant conditions; a demo does not reproduce every live constraint. The forex broker selection checklist for 2026 and choosing a broker guide address entity, permissions, costs and procedures. A licence does not guarantee loss-free trading or every fill; the available contract size can also rule out an account before its price comparison.

What to do tomorrow

  1. List two of your broker's account types side by side. Open the account specification page and note, for the standard and the raw account, three numbers on EUR/USD: the typical spread, the commission per side, and the commission for a full round turn. If the broker only quotes "per side", multiply by two to get the round-turn cost of one lot.
  2. Compare identical exposure. Use the actual contract size, permitted volume, spread, both commission sides, minimums, rounding and conversion. Add holding and account charges applicable to the scenario; one spread-plus-commission number is not every cost.
  3. Reconstruct the series. Match individual order sizes, partial fills, entry and exit conditions and holding periods. Multiplying one cost by trade count is valid only if the modeled orders and costs are identical. Do not count partial exits as independent full round turns or infer annual savings from an unweighted spread average.
  4. Choose using the actual cost calculation. Compare the available tariffs at your order size and holding period. There is no general rule requiring beginners to remain on Standard for two or three months.