Forex glossary

Recency Bias

Recency bias gives recent events excessive weight when assessing a broader body of evidence. In trading, it may mean judging a strategy only by its last few outcomes. New information can matter; the bias lies in unjustifiably discounting other observations, not merely in considering current evidence.

Illustrative example

How does it work in practice?

Suppose a journal contains 100 trades with three losses at the end. A trader declares the whole plan ineffective after reviewing only those three. Rule changes require assessing the full sample and possible changes in conditions.

A case to work through

Segment and whole

A fictional journal contains 80 trades with the last five separately marked.

  1. Assess the whole set and latest segment using matching measures.
  2. Check whether instruments, costs or rules changed.

What follows? Do not revise the plan solely around memorable entries.

Example boundary: No size of this illustrative sample guarantees a correct conclusion.

A useful distinction

Recency Bias / Overconfidence Bias

Overconfidence overestimates personal judgment; recency bias overweights recent observations.

Check your understanding

Separate a new observation from a justified assumption change.

Can new costs be considered?

Show the answer and explanation

Yes, within the full sample's context

Changed evidence differs from ignoring history.

Recording and assessing decisions

Step 8 / 10 · 0 / 10 reviewed

View the full sequence →

Progress is saved only in this browser.

Sources and documentation

The example illustrates the mechanism. Check current account conditions and instrument specifications with the provider.

Read this term in Polish →

This definition is unclear — send feedback

Feedback goes to the editorial team. Do not include account details, personal data or contact information.

← Back to the glossary